Skip to content

Menu

Ballard Spahr LLP logo
HomeAboutPublicationsServicesContact

Money Laundering Watch

Insights and news on the world of financial corruption

Home » 2016 Year in Review: Panama Papers

2016 Year in Review: Panama Papers

By Peter D. Hardy on January 29, 2017
Posted in Criminal Enforcement, Cybersecurity, Department of Justice (DOJ), Offshore Account, Panama Papers, Whistleblower

As the world knows, the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca was the subject of a stunning data breach of approximately 11.5 million financial and legal documents in April 2016. These leaked documents, the so-called “Panama Papers,” have been publicized primarily by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and allegedly reveal a global system of undisclosed offshore accounts, money laundering, and other illegal activity. The effect of the Panama Papers has been explosive—the documents allegedly implicate world leaders, financiers, celebrities, and other prominent individuals from across the world in the use of shell companies to conceal assets and possible illegal activity from their home governments. The Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has indicated that it is launching an investigation into these matters, as have enforcement agencies in many other countries.

To date, reports have suggested that relatively few U.S. citizens have employed the services—legitimate or otherwise—of Mossack Fonseca. However, and even before the Panama Papers came to light, reports also have suggested that individuals from across the globe have perceived that the United States is a secure place to hide assets. The states of Nevada, Wyoming, and Delaware—which allow for the quick creation of limited liability companies without identifying the true beneficial owners—have been criticized in particular.  The Panama Papers have sharpened the national and global focus on the risks associated with money laundering, tax evasion, terrorist financing, and other illicit activity arising from the creation and use of U.S. entities whose true owners are obscured through corporate forms, as well as the need to identify the people behind these entities. The Panama Papers also illustrate how the growing possibility and ease of massive data breaches upends any notion that even the most powerful can count on privacy.

Although stated efforts at regulatory reform have been ongoing for years, the Panama Papers scandal clearly motivated the U.S. government to act in 2016 to address the alleged attempts by non-U.S. individuals to launder their proceeds of illegal activities through U.S. financial transactions. As discussed below, a key focus of the U.S. government’s recent regulatory campaign—and of international enforcement efforts—is on identifying the true beneficial owners involved in financial transactions. This trend of expanding duties increases the potential risks—simply due to the expanding universe of required government scrutiny and filings—for entities and individuals accepting money from, or making representations on behalf of, possible bad actors from abroad or in the United States.

If you would like to remain updated on these issues, please click here to subscribe to Money Laundering Watch.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
"Real Housewives" Star Indicted for Money Laundering and Fraud
April 1, 2021
Criminal Enforcement Round Up: October Yields a Trio of High-Profile Money Laundering Charges With International Focus
October 30, 2020
United States “Beats” Switzerland as a Perceived Global Haven for Money Laundering and Tax Evasion
February 20, 2020

Subscribe to the blog to receive daily notifications when new posts are published.

The Ballard AML Team
Click to view the Cannabis Legislation Tracker
Click to view the CTA Resource Center

Stay Connected

RSS LinkedIn Twitter YouTube

Topics

Archives

Links to Other Resources

  • Ballard Spahr Anti-Money Laundering Services
  • Corporate Transparency Act Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rule
  • Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council – Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual
  • Federal Tax Crimes
  • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
  • FINRA Rule 3310 Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program
  • Illicit Edge
  • IRS BSA Examination Techniques for Bank Secrecy Act Industries
  • IRS Money Services Business (MSB) Information Center
  • Money Laundering Bulletin
  • New York Department of Financial Services BSA/AML and OFAC Regulations
  • Office of Foreign Assets Control
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency BSA Webpage
  • SEC Anti-Money Laundering Source Tool for Broker-Dealers
  • The Financial Action Task Force
  • U.S. Department of Justice – Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering
  • U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Attorneys Manual – Title 9: Criminal Money Laundering

Recent Posts

  • Cracking Down on CJNG: FinCEN’s Alert and OFAC’s Strategic Sanctions on Oil Smuggling
  • Navigating FinCEN’s Actions on Huione Group: Strengthening Defenses Against Money Laundering
  • FinCEN’s Southwest Border Geographic Targeting Order Faces Challenges in Texas and Southern California
  • A New Era for Digital Assets: The Impact of DOJ’s Shift Away from Regulation by Prosecution and Its Implications
  • Anti-Money Laundering Aspects of the GENIUS Act

Money Laundering Watch

by the White Collar Defense/Internal Investigations Group at Ballard Spahr LLP

Contact

Terence M. Grugan
grugant@ballardspahr.com
215.864.8320
RSS LinkedIn Twitter YouTube
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

About

Ballard Spahr’s Anti-Money Laundering Team represents a broad range of financial institutions.  We help clients establish and refine AML policies and procedures; prepare for and respond to regulatory exams; conduct due diligence for lending and acquisitions; and conduct internal investigations and respond to administrative, civil or criminal investigations, government enforcement actions, and related civil ligation by private parties.

Copyright © 2025, Ballard Spahr LLP All Rights Reserved.
www.ballardspahr.com
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo