Skip to content

Menu

Ballard Spahr LLP logo
HomeAboutPublicationsServicesContact

Money Laundering Watch

Insights and news on the world of financial corruption

Home » 2016 Year End Review: Virtual Currency: DOJ and IRS Broadly Seek Virtual Currency Account User Information

2016 Year End Review: Virtual Currency: DOJ and IRS Broadly Seek Virtual Currency Account User Information

By Marjorie J. Peerce, Brad Gershel & Peter D. Hardy on February 5, 2017
Posted in Department of Justice (DOJ), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Offshore Account, Virtual Currency

Data Stream of Binary CodeUnder Internal Revenue Code section 7609(f), the IRS may issue a “John Doe” administrative summons to discover the identities of unknown taxpayers. A “John Doe” summons can be a powerful enforcement tool because it allows the government to force third parties, such as banks and credit card companies, to provide numerous records regarding suspected tax code violations by persons whose precise identities are unknown to the IRS but who, as a group, are suspected of tax evasion. The IRS may serve a “John Doe” summons on a third party only with federal court approval.

On November 30, 2016, a federal judge in the Northern District of California granted an IRS application to serve a “John Doe” summons on Coinbase, Inc., which operates a virtual currency wallet and exchange business headquartered in San Francisco. The court found that the summons “relates to the investigation of an ascertainable group or class of persons, that there is a reasonable basis for believing that such group or class of persons has failed or may have failed to comply with any provision of any internal revenue laws, and that the information sought to be obtained from the examination of the records or testimony (and the identities of the persons with respect to whose liability the summons is issued) are not readily available from other sources.” The government has not alleged that Coinbase has violated any law.

In the memorandum and declaration supporting the petition to serve the summons, the government asserted that virtual currency represents not only a potential vehicle for tax evasion, but also a possible conduit for money laundering. The government’s memorandum in part quoted a 2014 Government Accountability Office report, which found that because of “the higher degree of anonymity” offered by virtual currencies, they “may be attractive to parties seeking to . . . move or conceal money obtained by illegal means.” The government is seeking records of Coinbase users who transferred virtual currency between December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2015, including their U.S. addresses, telephone numbers, email domains, and bank account information.

Coinbase is likely not the only virtual currency business that will receive a “John Doe” summons. In the ongoing enforcement campaign against more traditional undisclosed foreign bank accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, the U.S. Department of Justice and the IRS have used this powerful weapon against several Swiss banks, with long-term and substantial results. Having tasted success, the U.S. government presumably will use this same playbook against multiple virtual currency exchanges to root out alleged tax evasion and other crime. Federal courts generally can be expected to approve the summonses.

Nonetheless, such enforcement tools should not curb significantly the use of virtual currency, which continues to expand. Virtual currency is not merely the tool of would-be tax cheats or money launderers; it typically is used for perfectly legal activities, as the government itself has stated. The current action directed against the users of Coinbase is merely a reminder that virtual currency is not truly anonymous, and that those who use it to hide income or illicit activity should not assume impunity.

If you would like to remain updated on these issues, please click here to subscribe to Money Laundering Watch.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
Update: First Defendant Pleads and Agrees to Cooperate in $1.2 Billion Alleged Venezuelan Laundering Scheme
August 27, 2018
8 Charged With Highly Sophisticated $1.2 Billion International Money Laundering Conspiracy
August 2, 2018
The Courts Speak: Bank Liability for Alleged AML Failures Impacting Third Parties, and Hauling into U.S. Court Foreign Defendants Who Launder the Alleged Fruits of Foreign Crime
November 19, 2017
The Ballard AML Team
Stimulus Enforcement Tracker_blog
Click to view the Cannabis Legislation Tracker

Stay Connected

RSS LinkedIn Twitter YouTube

Topics

Archives

Publications
Events

Links to Other Resources

  • Ballard Spahr Anti-Money Laundering Services
  • Corporate Transparency Act
  • Digital Currency & Ledger Defense Coalition
  • Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council – Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual
  • Federal Tax Crimes
  • FINRA Rule 3310 Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program
  • IRS BSA Examination Techniques for Bank Secrecy Act Industries
  • IRS Money Services Business (MSB) Information Center
  • Money Laundering Bulletin
  • New York Department of Financial Services BSA/AML and OFAC Regulations
  • SEC Anti-Money Laundering Source Tool for Broker-Dealers
  • The Financial Action Task Force
  • U.S. Department of Justice – Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering
  • U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Attorneys Manual – Title 9: Criminal Money Laundering
  • U.S. Department of the Treasury – Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
  • U.S. Department of Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control

Recent Posts

  • Indictment Alleges Investor Fraud of Over $1 Billion – And Elaborate Money Laundering and Lavish Spending
  • Darkweb Cryptocurrency Mixer ChipMixer Shut Down for Allegedly Laundering $3 Billion Worth of Crypto
  • FinCEN and USPS Issue Alert on Mail-Theft Check Fraud and SAR Filing Instructions
  • Democratic Senators Send Letter to Federal Banking Agencies Raising Concerns About Fraudulent Transactions
  • DOJ Seeks to “KleptoCapture” Sanctioned Russian Oligarch’s NYC and Miami Properties Via Forfeiture

Money Laundering Watch

by the White Collar Defense/Internal Investigations Group at Ballard Spahr LLP

Contact

Peter D. Hardy
hardyp@ballardspahr.com
215.864.8838
RSS LinkedIn Twitter YouTube
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

About

Ballard Spahr’s Anti-Money Laundering Team represents a broad range of financial institutions.  We help clients establish and refine AML policies and procedures; prepare for and respond to regulatory exams; conduct due diligence for lending and acquisitions; and conduct internal investigations and respond to administrative, civil or criminal investigations, government enforcement actions, and related civil ligation by private parties.

Copyright © 2023, Ballard Spahr LLP All Rights Reserved.
www.ballardspahr.com
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo