Skip to content

Menu

Ballard Spahr LLP logo
HomeAboutPublicationsServicesContact

Money Laundering Watch

Insights and news on the world of financial corruption

Home » 2016 Year End Review: Virtual Currency: DOJ and IRS Broadly Seek Virtual Currency Account User Information

2016 Year End Review: Virtual Currency: DOJ and IRS Broadly Seek Virtual Currency Account User Information

By Marjorie J. Peerce, Brad Gershel & Peter D. Hardy on February 5, 2017
Posted in Department of Justice (DOJ), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Offshore Account, Virtual Currency

Data Stream of Binary CodeUnder Internal Revenue Code section 7609(f), the IRS may issue a “John Doe” administrative summons to discover the identities of unknown taxpayers. A “John Doe” summons can be a powerful enforcement tool because it allows the government to force third parties, such as banks and credit card companies, to provide numerous records regarding suspected tax code violations by persons whose precise identities are unknown to the IRS but who, as a group, are suspected of tax evasion. The IRS may serve a “John Doe” summons on a third party only with federal court approval.

On November 30, 2016, a federal judge in the Northern District of California granted an IRS application to serve a “John Doe” summons on Coinbase, Inc., which operates a virtual currency wallet and exchange business headquartered in San Francisco. The court found that the summons “relates to the investigation of an ascertainable group or class of persons, that there is a reasonable basis for believing that such group or class of persons has failed or may have failed to comply with any provision of any internal revenue laws, and that the information sought to be obtained from the examination of the records or testimony (and the identities of the persons with respect to whose liability the summons is issued) are not readily available from other sources.” The government has not alleged that Coinbase has violated any law.

In the memorandum and declaration supporting the petition to serve the summons, the government asserted that virtual currency represents not only a potential vehicle for tax evasion, but also a possible conduit for money laundering. The government’s memorandum in part quoted a 2014 Government Accountability Office report, which found that because of “the higher degree of anonymity” offered by virtual currencies, they “may be attractive to parties seeking to . . . move or conceal money obtained by illegal means.” The government is seeking records of Coinbase users who transferred virtual currency between December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2015, including their U.S. addresses, telephone numbers, email domains, and bank account information.

Coinbase is likely not the only virtual currency business that will receive a “John Doe” summons. In the ongoing enforcement campaign against more traditional undisclosed foreign bank accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, the U.S. Department of Justice and the IRS have used this powerful weapon against several Swiss banks, with long-term and substantial results. Having tasted success, the U.S. government presumably will use this same playbook against multiple virtual currency exchanges to root out alleged tax evasion and other crime. Federal courts generally can be expected to approve the summonses.

Nonetheless, such enforcement tools should not curb significantly the use of virtual currency, which continues to expand. Virtual currency is not merely the tool of would-be tax cheats or money launderers; it typically is used for perfectly legal activities, as the government itself has stated. The current action directed against the users of Coinbase is merely a reminder that virtual currency is not truly anonymous, and that those who use it to hide income or illicit activity should not assume impunity.

If you would like to remain updated on these issues, please click here to subscribe to Money Laundering Watch.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
"Real Housewives" Star Indicted for Money Laundering and Fraud
April 1, 2021
Criminal Enforcement Round Up: October Yields a Trio of High-Profile Money Laundering Charges With International Focus
October 30, 2020
United States “Beats” Switzerland as a Perceived Global Haven for Money Laundering and Tax Evasion
February 20, 2020

Subscribe to the blog to receive daily notifications when new posts are published.

The Ballard AML Team
Click to view the Cannabis Legislation Tracker
Click to view the CTA Resource Center

Stay Connected

RSS LinkedIn Twitter YouTube

Topics

Archives

Links to Other Resources

  • Ballard Spahr Anti-Money Laundering Services
  • Corporate Transparency Act Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rule
  • Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council – Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual
  • Federal Tax Crimes
  • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
  • FINRA Rule 3310 Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program
  • Illicit Edge
  • IRS BSA Examination Techniques for Bank Secrecy Act Industries
  • IRS Money Services Business (MSB) Information Center
  • Money Laundering Bulletin
  • New York Department of Financial Services BSA/AML and OFAC Regulations
  • Office of Foreign Assets Control
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency BSA Webpage
  • SEC Anti-Money Laundering Source Tool for Broker-Dealers
  • The Financial Action Task Force
  • U.S. Department of Justice – Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering
  • U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Attorneys Manual – Title 9: Criminal Money Laundering

Recent Posts

  • Status of FinCEN’s Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule
  • Inside the Secret Service’s Nationwide Crackdown on Card Skimming
  • FinCEN Imposes $3.5 Million Civil Penalty Against Paxful for BSA Violations
  • Treasury Targets Fraud: Heightened Bank Compliance Risks
  • Nevada’s $27 Million AML Crackdown on Caesars, MGM, and Resorts World

Money Laundering Watch

by the White Collar Defense/Internal Investigations Group at Ballard Spahr LLP

Contact

Terence M. Grugan
grugant@ballardspahr.com
215.864.8320
RSS LinkedIn Twitter YouTube
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

About

Ballard Spahr’s Anti-Money Laundering Team represents a broad range of financial institutions.  We help clients establish and refine AML policies and procedures; prepare for and respond to regulatory exams; conduct due diligence for lending and acquisitions; and conduct internal investigations and respond to administrative, civil or criminal investigations, government enforcement actions, and related civil ligation by private parties.

Copyright © 2026, Ballard Spahr LLP All Rights Reserved.
www.ballardspahr.com
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo